From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
To: Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org,
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de>,
nicholas.dokos@hp.com,
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>
Subject: Re: Re: moving in the agenda view is slow
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:11:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6610.1290982260@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> of "Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:17:38 GMT." <87mxot5hjx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Okay, here are mine for 11 presses of the n command:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> org-agenda-next-line 11 0.063334 0.0057576363
> next-line 11 0.033 0.003
> org-agenda-do-context-action 11 0.0301619999 0.0027419999
> org-display-outline-path 11 0.029602 0.0026910909
> org-get-outline-path 11 0.0232590000 0.0021144545
> org-up-heading-safe 44 0.0222319999 0.0005052727
> org-back-to-heading 44 0.0007169999 1.629...e-05
> org-format-outline-path 11 0.0004849999 4.409...e-05
> org-outline-level 77 0.0004790000 6.220...e-06
> org-unhighlight 15 0.0001899999 1.266...e-05
> org-add-props 33 9.399...e-05 2.848...e-06
> org-agenda-post-command-hook 15 4.499...e-05 2.999...e-06
> org-get-at-bol 11 3.9e-05 3.545...e-06
> org-detach-overlay 15 3.4e-05 2.266...e-06
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from here (but, again, this is on
> my home system which seems much faster than my office system despite
> being a slower computer with less memory etc).
>
> > PS Incidentally, note that in my case the next-line times account for
> > about 40% of the org-agenda-next-line times: the other 60% is accounted
> > for by org-agenda-do-context-action. In your original profile, the latter
> > was insignificant: that's why I'd like to see the next-line results.
>
> And in mine, next-line is >50% of the time with the remainder being
> org-agenda-do-context-action. What does this mean?
>
It's qualitatively different from Rainer's original profile.
org-agenda-next-line calls next-line and then
org-agenda-do-context-action. In Rainer's profile, the latter took
almost no time, whereas in your faster system and also in mine, there is
a roughly 50/50 (or 40/60) split. In Rainer's later profiles, it's a
100/0 split. That, along with the fact that the whole thing takes much
longer (somewhere from 10x to 50x[fn:1]) leads to the conclusion that
probably something is busted in next-line. So it doesn't mean much: just
gathering sticks for now and maybe we can build a house with them (then
again, maybe not).
> In any case, I will try all of this on Tuesday on my office system.
I'd be very interested to learn what you find out.
Thanks,
Nick
Footnotes:
[fn:1] this kind of variance bothers me, but I guess I'll have to live with it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-28 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-26 16:26 moving in the agenda view is slow Rainer Stengele
2010-11-26 16:46 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-11-26 18:20 ` org-mode gnus integration across two machines when using nnimap Tommy Kelly
2010-11-26 18:35 ` Dan Christensen
2010-11-26 18:53 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-11-26 19:40 ` Dan Christensen
2010-12-14 23:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-12-01 18:41 ` e20100633
2010-12-01 22:55 ` [Orgmode] " Eric S Fraga
2010-12-01 23:44 ` e20100633
2010-12-02 1:32 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-12-02 7:24 ` e20100633
2010-12-02 1:55 ` Greg Troxel
2010-12-02 2:58 ` Matt Lundin
2010-11-26 20:15 ` moving in the agenda view is slow Martin Stemplinger
2010-11-26 21:28 ` Markus Heller
2010-11-27 11:31 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-26 23:04 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-26 23:08 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-11-27 2:53 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-27 7:09 ` Manuel Hermenegildo
2010-11-27 11:22 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-27 11:21 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-27 17:00 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-27 18:25 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-27 19:23 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-27 21:11 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-28 0:30 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-28 18:38 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-28 20:01 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-28 20:17 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-28 22:11 ` Nick Dokos [this message]
2010-11-30 12:28 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-28 21:41 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-12-15 11:47 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-28 17:37 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-28 19:29 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-28 19:40 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-28 21:32 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-28 22:12 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-28 22:31 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-29 8:53 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-29 10:51 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-11-29 15:56 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-29 16:15 ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-11-30 12:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-01 14:18 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-12-01 15:11 ` moving in the agenda view is slow: solved! Rainer Stengele
2010-12-01 15:19 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-12-01 17:30 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6610.1290982260@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org \
--to=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rainer.stengele@diplan.de \
--cc=rainer.stengele@online.de \
--cc=ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).