From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:37:16 +0200 Message-ID: <64F0D23D-3D32-482C-8F95-ACF82F0FEFCF@gmail.com> References: <20100620094925.GA20877@upsilon.cc> <08902A9B-0C7F-41FB-AC8F-BFC65F296B5E@gmail.com> <20100622072316.GA14230@upsilon.cc> <4C208DAD.2060109@manor-farm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46505 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR0r3-0007wZ-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:37:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR0r1-0000BJ-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:37:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:54314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR0r1-0000BA-O3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:37:19 -0400 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so3631276wyf.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:37:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C208DAD.2060109@manor-farm.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: lists@manor-farm.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Stefano Zacchiroli On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Ian Barton wrote: > On 22/06/10 08:23, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> this is a FAQ: >>> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#timestamps-and-system-time- >>> locale >> >> Ah, thanks a lot Carsten, I did miss the FAQ entry. (I've only now >> noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed org-mode >> documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any reason >> for >> that?) >> > I think it's not included because it's part of Worg, which I think > is only available either in git or on the web. Maybe Worg should be > included in the standard package. No, I don't see why. It is on the web, easily accessible. - Carsten