Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> "Christopher M. Miles" <numbchild@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> It would be great if you can come up with a patch.
>>> 1. Keeping tags with explicitly assigned key binding indeed makes sense
>>> 2. If we limit the number of displayed tags (on top of explicitly
>>>    assigned), it should be a defcustom.
>>
>> Here is the patch.
>> -	(setq tbl fulltable char ?a cnt 0)
>> +	(setq tbl (seq-filter 'cdr fulltable) char ?a cnt 0)
>
> Thanks, but it will make the tag selection useless for people who did
> not customize explicit tag bindings.
>
> You should instead only filter when the number of tags exceeds some
> customized value.

What about like this?

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(setq tbl (let ((bound-tags (seq-filter 'cdr fulltable)))
                    (if (length> shortkeys 0)
                        bound-tags
                      (seq-take fulltable 26)))
              char ?a cnt 0)
#+end_src

-- 

[ stardiviner ]
I try to make every word tell the meaning that I want to express without misunderstanding.

Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
IRC(libera.chat, freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3