From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Tagging a region of text without creating a branch Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:27:37 +0200 Message-ID: <63255A67-9D91-414F-AEBB-B3D6D12015D1@gmail.com> References: <87r5tc919n.wl@imapmail.org> <426ABD01-2F97-4F67-BC37-96C079DF94FC@gmail.com> <96F16419-FA3F-4C33-899B-1C79C0CC840F@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxKwD-00038P-J1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:27:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxKwA-00037O-15 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:27:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40743 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MxKw9-00037J-RU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:27:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:38192) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxKw9-0005A3-Cg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:27:41 -0400 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so16104276ewy.42 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:27:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Org Mode List On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: > At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:05 +0200, > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >> On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: >> >>> Hi Carsten, >>> >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, this should now work. Good catch. >>>> >>>> You method with the tag on the END line would even be harmful, as >>>> it >>>> removes any text after the END line, up to the next heading. >>>> >>>> Can you show me the use case for not exporting inline tasks? >>>> Maybe I >>>> need to bring that variable back, if there is a good case for >>>> it.... >>> >>> Now that I am doing more of my writing in org-mode, I plan to use >>> inline tasks for marking up my drafts with TODOs. These reminders >>> would be "for my eyes only." When I publish the draft to LaTeX or >>> html >>> for sharing, I would thus prefer that the inline tasks be excluded. >> >> OK, I have re-introduced the variable org-inlinetask-export, as a >> Boolean. Do we need to be able to set this on a per-file basis? > > Thanks Carsten! An option to set per-file would indeed be nice. For > instance, if I'm working on an article, I might want to share one > version of it without visible inline tasks/comments and another with > them. > > That said, I suppose I could use local variables to do this. Local variables will not work, but #+BIND will. I guess this will be enough.... - Carsten