emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
To: Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: New Add defun org-mode-or-derived-mode-p
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61054BA2-E0B8-40B9-B62E-FB0EB04E99CF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wrdnigpd.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>


On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:

> Stefan Reichör <stefan@xsteve.at> writes:
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
>>>> +(defun org-mode-or-derived-mode-p ()
>>>> +  "Check if the current buffer is in Org-mode or a derived mode."
>>>> +  (if (derived-mode-p 'org-mode) t nil))
>>> 
>>> The if is superfluous.  And instead of a new function, I'd rather add an
>>> optional `derived' parameter to `org-mode-p'.
>> 
>> (derived-mode-p 'org-mode) returns either 'org-mode or nil
>> 
>> The reason for the if is, that (org-mode-p) returns either t or nil
> 
> Yes, but from an elisp perspective, 'org-mode is as true as t.
> 
> BTW: I'm not sure if there is any reasonable benefit for `org-mode-p',
> anyway.  Checking the rest of the emacs source tree, then the convention
> is to either use
> 
>  (eq major-mode 'foo-mode)
> 
> or
> 
>  (derived-mode-p 'foo-mode)
> 
> depending on what's needed.  I don't see why (org-mode-p) or even
> (org-mode-p 'derived) is clearer...

I agree, it is not clearer, only a bit more compact.
I don't think we should have a new function here.  Just make a patch
that used derived-mode-p in places where this is needed.  I would
accept such a patch.

- Carsten

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-06  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-02 11:09 [PATCH]: New Add defun org-mode-or-derived-mode-p Stefan Reichör
2011-09-02 14:59 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-09-05  6:50   ` Stefan Reichör
2011-09-05  7:36     ` Tassilo Horn
2011-10-06  8:20       ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2011-10-11  7:18         ` Tassilo Horn
2011-10-22  9:31           ` Bastien
2011-11-03 21:35             ` Cassio Koshikumo
2011-11-06 15:11               ` David Maus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61054BA2-E0B8-40B9-B62E-FB0EB04E99CF@gmail.com \
    --to=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=tassilo@member.fsf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).