From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: POLL: the 40 variables project Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:16:56 +0100 Message-ID: <607CE65C-55E5-4678-B6CC-65505857EC54@uva.nl> References: <3CA13AF2-AFF7-49D1-97B6-7AF5AF6C1301@uva.nl> <7ACEEBD0-B96A-4181-A729-2E226E8935D4@uva.nl> <45E50DB7-E2E5-4DBB-AD44-3CC650ADD1C1@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpUl-0007gg-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:17:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpUj-0007fz-Lt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:17:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41881 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpUj-0007fw-Jc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:17:01 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:38951) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSpUj-0001lT-81 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:17:01 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so89336nfi.26 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:17:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Manish Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Manish wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> > [snip] >> >> You need to change $2 and $1 to the relevant columns in your table, >> maybe this is the problem? > > Yes, I had changed only one of them. Thanks. > >> I made this formula on one of your extracted tables where the >> variable >> was in column one and I have created a new column 2 for the default >> values. >> >> also, the formula seems to return (nil) or (t) instead of nil or t, >> so it seems to add an additional pair of parenthesis. > > When I applied the formula on the main table (in raw data file), it > did > return nil, (nil), t, (t) and complex for values. Perhaps getting a > nil > or (nil) or a t or (t) depends on the kind of values a variable can > take? > > Anyhow, I will try and add additional results to the data if we get > more > responses (so far 2.) And please use the default values to clean out "configurations" to the default. Thanks! - Carsten