From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: exporting - filtering Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:07:53 +0200 Message-ID: <60114AF9-8D30-4D12-8911-6A813B0AFAD1@uva.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfZLg-0008Gx-IM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:08:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfZLe-0008En-0B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:08:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56037 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfZLd-0008Ej-Ol for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:08:01 -0400 Received: from postduif.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.180]:55084) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KfZLc-0000NV-LI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:08:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard G Riley Cc: org-mode On Sep 15, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Richard G Riley wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> On Jul 22, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Richard G Riley wrote: >> >>> >>> When publishing/exporting can I limit certain sections to only >>> exported >>> if they are tagged for export? e.g I have a normal org mode >>> hierarchy >>> for my web page but then import a task based org file and then only >>> have >>> some of those published? If not I think it would be nice addition >>> some >>> time in the future. >> >> I have finally been able to get to this message, and I am wondering >> what the logic should be. I think it is rather straight forward to >> mark subtrees that should be *excluded* from export. You can, in >> fact, already do so by starting a tree with the COMMENT keyword, >> which > > How does this affect agenda generation? Point taken, indeed, comments also do not contribute to the agenda. I'll look into the tags idea.