From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
To: Russell Adams <RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Duration Tally
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d0f364daf5b03d86df0137293c136e7@science.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070613134706.GA10452@odin.demosthenes.org>
On Jun 13, 2007, at 15:47, Russell Adams wrote:
> If this feature already exists, I've missed it...
>
> I'm planning ahead on some items, and having a way to represent the
> amount of time a TODO item will take, and then having the parent total
> the duration of the children would be very helpful.
>
> * TODO A {6h}
> ** TODO a1 {2h}
> ** TODO a2 {2h}
> ** TODO a3 {2h}
>
> I know doing time conversion is a real pain, so I'm only thinking a
> simple sum.
This would be something like a hierarchical computation tool.
This is interesting, but the restriction to planned ours
may be a bit too narrow.
> It could be nice later to schedule A, and then have each
> of a1-3 show up on the agenda based on their duration.
I am not sure if I understand what you mean here.
- Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 13:47 Duration Tally Russell Adams
2007-06-13 15:33 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-06-14 2:15 ` Russell Adams
2007-06-14 13:28 ` Jason F. McBrayer
2007-06-19 7:00 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-06-19 11:24 ` Russell Adams
2007-06-19 16:20 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-06-19 17:45 ` Scott Jaderholm
2007-06-19 18:28 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-06-22 15:56 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-06-22 19:06 ` Scott Jaderholm
2007-06-22 19:35 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-06-13 21:58 ` Scott Jaderholm
[not found] ` <b71b18520706131837m42b32f5cs174d94c2b353d16d@mail.gmail.com>
2007-06-15 0:13 ` Fwd: " Eddward DeVilla
2007-06-15 6:21 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-06-19 2:16 ` Russell Adams
2007-06-19 7:02 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2007-06-19 11:21 ` Russell Adams
2007-06-19 13:10 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-06-19 17:12 ` Russell Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d0f364daf5b03d86df0137293c136e7@science.uva.nl \
--to=dominik@science.uva.nl \
--cc=RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).