From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Regressions in 4.42?
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:16:49 +0200
Message-ID: <5a6aeadde1e836f4cc32b614813a9a46@science.uva.nl>
References: <1152198589.4071.18.camel@elrond.zur.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fyjei-00051P-Vr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:17:37 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fyjec-00050u-5D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:17:36 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fyjec-00050k-0o
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:17:30 -0400
Received: from [146.50.4.51] (helo=imap.science.uva.nl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fyjex-0008Gr-Ow
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:17:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1152198589.4071.18.camel@elrond.zur.novell.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Egli <christian.egli@novell.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Jul 6, 2006, at 17:09, Christian Egli wrote:

> Hi Carsten
>
> I'm using org-mode 4.42 (Emacs from CVS). It seems to me that there are
> some regressions.
>
>      1. org-agenda-redo marks all org buffers as modified:
>         org-save-all-org-buffers works great but seems to expose a bug.
>         When I hit 'r' (in the agenda buffer) to redo my agenda, all my
>         org buffers seem to become modified and hence
>         org-save-all-org-buffers always has to save all the buffers as
>         the seem dirty. Reproduce by repeatedly typing 'r' and 's' in
>         the org agenda buffer.

Yes, I can reproduce this.  The buffers are not really changed, all I 
am doing is changing  a few text properties to mark comments and 
ARCHIVED subtrees.  Emacs sees these changes as enough reason to raise 
the buffer-modified flag.

>      2. Regression in org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled and
>         org-agenda-todo-list-sublevels: in the previous version I was
>         able to hide subtasks by setting org-agenda-todo-list-sublevels
>         to nil and to hide scheduled TODOs by setting
>         org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled to t. The agenda buffer would
>         only show the topmost task and would only show it for the
>         specific day if scheduled. However with 4.42 as soon as I
>         schedule the topmost task is hidden from the list of open 
> tasks,
>         but the subtasks are shown in the list of open tasks, which is
>         not how it (correctly) worked before.

Also this I can reproduce - antoerh bug related to the introduction of 
the ARCHIVE tag.

Both problems will be fixed in 4.43, thanks.

- Carsten