Mahalo Tom,

It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block.  That said, it would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language specification.

Greg


On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:

> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <gtuckerkellogg@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code.  I'd like to be able
>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot".  Using :results value
>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code.  Is
>> there a way to specify the coding language
>> of a generated #+RESULTS  src block?  
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
> Aloha Greg,
> 
> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that
> generates dot code.
> 
> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix
> #+header: :file temp.pdf 
> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf
> #+header: :results output
> #+BEGIN_SRC dot
> $input
> #+END_SRC
> 
> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?
> 
> All the best,
> Tom
> 
> -- 
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com