* Searching on items scheduled <today +1w>
@ 2008-11-28 20:24 Lindsay Todd
2008-11-30 8:54 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lindsay Todd @ 2008-11-28 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: org-mode
Folks,
I would like to extract items that are "NEXT" action todo-items
from my master gtd.org file, for reference in my paper planner, and
make a custom agenda command to repeat this. Most of what I want to
do is easy with the TODO search. But I don't really want items that
won't be scheduled by sometime in the next week. I see that TODO
items without a SCHEDULED keyword will always be selected with
+SCHEDULED<"<today>". But how do I include items scheduled for the
next week as well?
What hasn't worked:
+SCHEDULED<"<today+1w>" (the documentation suggested
this wouldn't work)
+SCHEDULED<"<+1w>" (not sure why I thought this
had a chance)
What does work:
+SCHEDULED<"<2008-12-05>" (but only works today!)
Did I miss something?
/Lindsay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Searching on items scheduled <today +1w>
2008-11-28 20:24 Searching on items scheduled <today +1w> Lindsay Todd
@ 2008-11-30 8:54 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-11-30 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lindsay Todd; +Cc: org-mode
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:24 PM, Lindsay Todd wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would like to extract items that are "NEXT" action todo-items
> from my master gtd.org file, for reference in my paper planner, and
> make a custom agenda command to repeat this. Most of what I want to
> do is easy with the TODO search. But I don't really want items that
> won't be scheduled by sometime in the next week. I see that TODO
> items without a SCHEDULED keyword will always be selected with
> +SCHEDULED<"<today>". But how do I include items scheduled for the
> next week as well?
>
> What hasn't worked:
>
> +SCHEDULED<"<today+1w>" (the documentation suggested
> this wouldn't work)
> +SCHEDULED<"<+1w>" (not sure why I thought this
> had a chance)
Why?
Because that would be a syntax very consistent with how Org handles such
things in other places. I have added this, thanks for the idea.
- Carsten
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1966 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-30 19:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-28 20:24 Searching on items scheduled <today +1w> Lindsay Todd
2008-11-30 8:54 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).