From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: BUG? - Time summary overlay inherits org-tag face if heading has tags Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:32:27 +0100 Message-ID: <57E68996-7506-494C-8257-3706E19D0216@uva.nl> References: <41c818190901202059u7492a8aej8bbc550b8f4649ba@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190901210751t49439239sd69fdcc9755078eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPt7D-00087j-W7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPt7A-00087X-NR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35334 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPt7A-00087U-FS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:32 -0500 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.145]:5323) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPt79-00051l-Ua for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:32 -0500 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so454664eyg.24 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:32:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41c818190901210751t49439239sd69fdcc9755078eb@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: emacs-orgmode list On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:51 PM, William Henney wrote: > Hi Carsten > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Carsten Dominik = > wrote: >>> If a heading has tags, then that heading's time summary overlay =20 >>> (shown >>> by C-c C-x C-d) is displayed using the org-tag face. This looks a =20= >>> bit >>> strange. Is it intended? >> >> >> What is intended is that the face should be only a highlight, and =20 >> inherit >> the rest from the headline face which is below the overlay. >> >> Of course the assumption was that the tag face would not be too =20 >> different >> from the headline face.... >> > > Apologies for violating your assumption then :) :-) > > > I take it that fixing this would not be straightforward? Of course. I have now introduced a new face for this purpose. It still defaults to secondary-selection, but you can now customize it. The name of the face is `org-clock-overlay'. > In that case, > it is probably not worth bothering with for a purely cosmetic issue. I > had put the tags in a smaller font so they weren't quite so in my > face. I was wondering if I could achieve a similar effect by having > the tags go in a property drawer instead of in the headline, but I > couldn't see from the manual how to do this. The TAGS property seems > to be created on the fly. Yes, TAGS are no property, they can only be accessed like properties, for simplicity and consistency of the property interface. This is fully on purpose, because I think the purpose of tags is defeated when you can no longer see them. Hope this helps. - Carsten > > Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, > Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia Look at that, another astronomer!!!!! :-)