From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stelian Iancu <si@siancu.net>
Subject: Re: bug in org-habits
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:02:35 +0100
Message-ID: <5639C9AB.6050706@iancu.ch>
References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <84io5j1k5h.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALnw1fTau74U258Ewdj6CyFuMWEAyauqsds+izFtiSJJxoc+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2a8qv1b3o.fsf@newartisans.com> <84611j19hk.fsf@gmail.com>
	<5638C2A1.2090801@iancu.ch> <87h9l32gfc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<m2io5ievpz.fsf@newartisans.com> <87d1vq3mh4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<m2pozqdei2.fsf@newartisans.com> <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<m28u6eby6f.fsf@newartisans.com> <87ziyu1wfe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<m2lhae7f2h.fsf@newartisans.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43872)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <si@siancu.net>) id 1Zttxp-0006cH-VW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 04:02:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <si@siancu.net>) id 1Zttxl-0003zE-3h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 04:02:41 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]:32840)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <si@siancu.net>) id 1Zttxk-0003yj-Qi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 04:02:37 -0500
Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so104900526wme.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:02:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2lhae7f2h.fsf@newartisans.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 04/11/15 02:01, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Also, supporting both locations means that users will pay the full price in
>> entries without a property drawer, even if they chose the fast path, i.e.,
>> drawer at the beginning of the entry, in the first place. This kind of
>> defeats some of the advantages of the current state.
>
> It wouldn't be "users": it would be people intentionally opting to allow
> floating properties. _I_ would be paying the price, and I will pay it happily
> to keep 8.2 behavior.
>
> John
>

I would also like to have the 8.2 behavior. If it's easier, it would be 
fine to always have the drawer either in the beginning or in the end and 
nowhere else (and have an option to chose with the default in the 
beginning).

S.