From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fix SETUPFILE pathname expansion with subdirectories Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:14 -0400 Message-ID: <56047142.1060404@bbn.com> References: <87bncxhe5i.fsf@kyleam.com> <1442726933-14360-1-git-send-email-rhansen@bbn.com> <5601D603.7060303@bbn.com> <87mvwcw7jq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfEU4-0002RG-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfEU2-0004HD-A4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.bbn.com ([128.33.1.81]:14708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfEU2-0004Gh-74 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:18 -0400 Received: from socket.bbn.com ([192.1.120.102]:57005) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfETz-0005VE-Fk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mvwcw7jq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2015-09-24 04:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Applied. Thank you. Thank you! > > Would it make sense to do the same for INCLUDE? If so, would you want to > have a look at it? A chain of #+INCLUDEs already works OK. I'll send a patch that tweaks the test-org-export/expand-include test case to ensure that it continues to work. The intended meanings of #+INCLUDE and #+SETUPFILE have never been clear to me, so I have a couple of questions: * What is supposed to happen if you have a #+SETUPFILE that has an #+INCLUDE? * What is supposed to happen if you have an #+INCLUDE file that has a #+SETUPFILE line? -Richard