From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas Subject: Re: ob-csharp Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: <55EEB2EB.40309@friendlyvillagers.com> References: <55EDC82E.2080501@friendlyvillagers.com> <360419367.aMLHIlplUU@descartes> <55EE9007.7070103@friendlyvillagers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZFmV-0007QA-EC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:05:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZFmQ-0000Hc-CU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:05:38 -0400 Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5300::2]:42819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZFmQ-0000HI-2m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:05:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p5796AF3E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.150.175.62]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.12 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id V074c5r88A5VXOd (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:05:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <55EE9007.7070103@friendlyvillagers.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org well allright. I did some tests and think csharp-mode is not necessary. So I guess it would be OK to leave it out. Can anybody confirm? - thomas On 08.09.2015 09:36, thomas wrote: > Thanks for the quick replies. > > I'd really like to contribute to core, if that's possible > (practically, I did nothing though; I just stripped Eric's ob-java and > changed a few lines). > > As Rüdiger pointed out csharp-mode is not part of Emacs. > But I'm not sure if csharp-mode is really necessary (besides syntax > highlighting in the org buffer). > > We might leave it out? > > > - thomas > > > > > > On 08.09.2015 00:44, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote: >> On Monday 07 September 2015 15:10:59 Grant Rettke wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >>>> It can live in core, contrib, or as an emacs package. >>> When it lives in core, it is available to everyone who downloads >>> Emacs. That is valuable because some users never install a single >>> package. >> But it requires csharp-mode, which is not part of GNU Emacs. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rüdiger >> > >