From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph LANGE Subject: Re: Subject: Bug: org-time-stamp-inactive on the end of a CLOCK interval edits start time [8.3.1 (8.3.1-elpaplus @ c:/Users/clange/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20150805/)] Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:45:22 +0200 Message-ID: <55C7F422.2060206@gmail.com> References: <55C7659D.8050408@gmail.com> <874mk89jsa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZObDV-0006KA-S1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 20:45:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZObDS-0007aA-Ci for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 20:45:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:33674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZObDS-0007Zz-6J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 20:45:26 -0400 Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so116546841wij.0 for ; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 17:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (x5d817c6d.dyn.telefonica.de. [93.129.124.109]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm26732093wjx.20.2015.08.09.17.45.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Aug 2015 17:45:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874mk89jsa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Nicolas Goaziou on 2015-08-10 00:30: > Christoph LANGE writes: >> I frequently use org-time-stamp or org-time-stamp-inactive to adjust >> intervals logged with CLOCK:. Before upgrading to 8.3.1 I was able to >> adjust the end of a CLOCK'ed interval of the format "CLOCK: start--end >> => difference" by calling org-time-stamp or org-time-stamp-inactive >> while having the point placed on "end". As of 8.3.1 it seems that the >> function always offers to edit "start". > > I cannot reproduce the problem. I can edit both with C-c !, depending on > the point. Indeed that's what I get in the same *.org file when starting Emacs with "-q". So it must depend on my configuration. I'm not sure how to investigate this – would you have an idea? Many thanks in advance, Christoph -- Dr. Christoph Lange, Enterprise Information Systems Department Applied Computer Science @ University of Bonn; Fraunhofer IAIS http://langec.wordpress.com/about, Skype duke4701 → Web Intelligence Summer School “Question Answering with the Web” Saint-Étienne, FR. Apply by 4 July @ https://wiss.univ-st-etienne.fr/