From: Carsten Dominik <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "I.S." <email@example.com>
Cc: David Maus <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
Subject: Re: proposal for enhanced org-get-priority function
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:25:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5536343D-8741-46A9-8A81-849E141414A2@gmail.com> (raw)
I would like to have a show of hands who is interested in this
treatment of finer priorities. Should we add this patch (I don't vote
because I do not use priorities)
On Oct 29, 2010, at 1:53 PM, I.S. wrote:
> Sorry, previous patch had some junk in it. Attached is the final
> version (really).
> Sorry again for the confusion,
> On 10/29/2010 7:45 AM, I.S. wrote:
>> Sorry, I realized the previous patch did not contain updates to the
>> org-priority-regexp. An updated patch is attached.
>> On 10/27/2010 8:01 AM, I.S. wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2010 3:18 PM, David Maus wrote:
>>>> At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:14:39 -0400,
>>>> I.S. wrote:
>>>>> Dear Experts,
>>>>> I'd like to propose a replacement for the org-get-priority
>>>>> which is backward compatible with the current version but allows
>>>>> user to add a sub-priority such as [#A]-5 or [#B]+3:
>>>> Could you provide a patch against current master and send it to the
>>>> list as a text/plain attachment? This way the proposed
>>>> will end up in Org's patchtracker.
>>>> -- David
>>>>  http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/
>>>> OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
>>>> Jabber.... firstname.lastname@example.org
>>>> Email..... email@example.com
>>> I tried looing at patchwork but couldn't figure out what I was
>>> supposed to do. Please advise on usage instructions.
>>> Instead, I attached a manually generated patch against org.el in
>>> the development version from git. I created this patch via
>>> $ git clone git://repo.or.cz/org-mode.git
>>> $ emacs org-mode/lisp/org.el # to modify the file and write it to
>>> $ diff -rup org.el org.mine.el > org-get-priority.patch
>>> Please advise on proper procedure as I love org and would enjoy
>>> the chance to contribute in the future.
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-20 17:14 proposal for enhanced org-get-priority function I.S.
2010-10-24 19:18 ` David Maus
2010-10-24 20:05 ` George Pearson
2010-10-27 12:01 ` I.S.
2010-10-29 11:45 ` I.S.
2010-10-29 11:53 ` I.S.
2010-11-15 10:25 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2010-11-15 12:07 ` Juan Pechiar
2010-11-15 12:15 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-11-15 18:05 ` I.S.
2010-11-16 0:30 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 8:16 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-11-17 13:11 ` I.S.
2010-11-17 19:21 ` Matt Lundin
2010-11-16 1:11 ` Matt Lundin
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).