From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert Klein <RoKlein@roklein.de>
Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:35 +0100
Message-ID: <5515487F.1020208@roklein.de>
References: <olulhipz45z.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>	<87d23znv5a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<55110E84.3060408@roklein.de>	<87zj72n5xk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<86d23y3gxi.fsf@example.com>	<5512A024.5050509@roklein.de>
	<86k2y4b1gt.fsf@example.com>	<olur3sbykle.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>	<87lhijldia.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>	<olumw2zxyj3.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87iodmk8j5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33733)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <roklein@roklein.de>) id 1YbT56-0002vK-Qf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:09:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <roklein@roklein.de>) id 1YbT51-0002Rt-Sa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:09:44 -0400
Received: from gate1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de ([194.95.63.248]:57628)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <roklein@roklein.de>) id 1YbT51-0002QT-LX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:09:39 -0400
Received: from [10.20.2.71] (port=39273 helo=vmmail1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de)
	by gate1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <RoKlein@roklein.de>)
	id 1YbT4x-0003G5-0t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:35 +0100
Received: from pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de ([10.20.70.90])
	by vmmail1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <RoKlein@roklein.de>) id 1YbT4x-0004e8-52
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87iodmk8j5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

On 03/27/2015 12:02 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

>> I completely agree.  My question was, what a use case would be that
>> requires a COMMENT that behaves different from #'ing the individual
>> lines (and is not covered by :noexport: already).
> 
> I don't think there is any. This is basically what my first patch did
> (i.e., removing any COMMENT subtree at the very beginning of export
> process), but it nevertheless surprised some users.
> 


Just a note: I didn't know of :noexport: before Andreas brought it up in
this thread.

If you revert the second patch, please put a note in the release notes
for the next org release, so the other babel users know a migration path.

Best regards
Robert