From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Zotero csl file that uses parenthetical style for citations Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:11:23 +0530 Message-ID: <54FA9D93.6010101@gmail.com> References: <87h9tyntm6.fsf@gmx.us> <54F9B014.3020901@gmail.com> <87y4namdnu.fsf@gmx.us> <54F9C5E3.5000301@gmail.com> <877fuu0yy4.fsf@berkeley.edu> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8Oe-0007dI-3o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:39:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8OY-0003Q5-SD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:39:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]:39806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8OY-0003Pz-Je for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:39:30 -0500 Received: by pdbft15 with SMTP id ft15so20235553pdb.6 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:39:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877fuu0yy4.fsf@berkeley.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Friday 06 March 2015 11:51 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote: > Hi Vaidheeswaran, > > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was >> clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles. > > Rasmus pointed you to a relevant style: > > https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-date.csl > > I think you might be mixing up two different distinctions. A > "parenthetical style" like this one is distinguished from, say, a > numeric style (like the ACM styles, I think). This distinction between > "parenthetical" and numeric styles applies to the document as a whole. > > This distinction is orthogonal to the distinction between whether > *individual citations* are parenthetical (like "(Auth 2000)") or in-text > (like "Auth (2000)"). > > So there is not really any such thing as an "in-text CSL style". > Rather, there are CSL styles that support both in-text and parenthetical > citations (which is most of them, I'd guess). Your guess is just a guess. You haven't looked at chicago-author-date style, have you? You can prove yourself right by (a) producing an "off-the-shelf" CSL file that uses BOTH "in-text" AND "parenthetical" citations. (b) producing a csl-based tool that ORG CAN INTERFACE WITH that produces "in-text" AND "parenthetical" styles.