From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Citation syntax: Underscore MUST(?) be allowed in cite keys? Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:58:57 +0530 Message-ID: <54FA9AA9.9070505@gmail.com> References: <874mq0399a.fsf@gmx.us> <54F75222.8030805@gmail.com> <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp8o6nt9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87fv9i9z8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnk60zhc.fsf@berkeley.edu> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8Cl-0003XC-Kg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:27:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8Ci-0000Mg-Er for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:27:19 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8Ci-0000MR-7S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:27:16 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YU8Cf-0007ko-LQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 07:27:13 +0100 Received: from 223.180.117.60 ([223.180.117.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 07:27:13 +0100 Received: from vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju by 223.180.117.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 07:27:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bnk60zhc.fsf@berkeley.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Friday 06 March 2015 11:39 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote: > Hi Vaidheeswaran, > > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> The following combination works when passed through the LaTeX/PDF >> exporter. It doesn't work when the cite syntax is switched to the new >> one. >> >> \cite{center_for_history_and_new_media_zotero_????} > > Is that a realistic example of a key? Yes. > What program is generating it? JabRef? It is generated by Zotero. > I am not too worried about this case. Have you tried it with \cite{} and \bibliography{} combination and seen it works or not. My argument relies on how existing tool works. > I am guessing that the four "?"s at the end are inserted because the > generating program wasn't sure how to encode some characters. I see that you haven't exporter Zotero libraries to .bib files. My guess is the 4 question marks are for "missing" (or "irrelevant") yyyy digits. > If key-ending punctuation turns out to be common, I would revise > this opinion, but at the moment I don't see the need. I am not imagining things. I am pointing out how existing tools behave.