From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Citation syntax: Underscore MUST(?) be allowed in cite keys? Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:48:47 +0530 Message-ID: <54F75A97.3000201@gmail.com> References: <874mq0399a.fsf@gmx.us> <54F75222.8030805@gmail.com> <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTEmr-0007uZ-P9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:16:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTEmm-0003MA-Jh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:16:53 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTEmm-0003M1-DQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:16:48 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTEmj-0000hA-Ki for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:16:45 +0100 Received: from 106.216.140.181 ([106.216.140.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:16:45 +0100 Received: from vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju by 106.216.140.181 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:16:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thursday 05 March 2015 12:31 AM, Rasmus wrote: > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> I am complaining about how org-element.el behaves. >> >> This [cite:@adler_how_1972] becomes this: > > Oh, you are right. _ is only allowed as the first character, as you > probably saw. See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95609. > I would tend to agree that this is problematic, but _ is itself > problematic since it's the subscription character... From > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95631 I gather that key > support is modeled after Pandoc, but AFAIK Pandoc *does* support _ as part > of the key cf. http://pandoc.org/README.html#citations. My refrain on Citation syntax thread has always been: The 3rd-Party Citation Tools are *very much* part of the what is being proposed. Has someone built a prototype that _actually_ interfaces with these citation tools to understand what the practical constraints are? The workflow question I raised is very much in tune with the above refrain. > So yeah, I agree with you. > > –Rasmus >