From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:27:12 +0530 Message-ID: <54ED6438.6050306@gmail.com> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54EC2379.9050106@gmail.com> <871tle4ns7.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQUwF-0002NX-5m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:55:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQUwA-0002ur-Ad for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:55:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]:43736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQUwA-0002tq-2n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:55:10 -0500 Received: by paceu11 with SMTP id eu11so2595257pac.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:55:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871tle4ns7.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wednesday 25 February 2015 09:59 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote: > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> If you need help with ODT/JabRef integration, I am willing to lend a >> hand. (Only thing is) I would expect that someone hand-hold me wrt >> what one wants in the final exporter on a case-by-case basis. I would >> rather build bottom-up, rather than top-down. > > That's great, thanks! > > I don't know if JabRef will be a/the tool we eventually want to > `bless'...from what you say, it sounds more limited than Zotero, though > I don't know because I haven't personally used either...but it's nice to > have volunteers! I agree that we should go for the best tool chain that is available. I wish you success with your new initiative. Do write to me if you ever feel that JabRef-based workflow will be of some interest to you with your document production needs.