From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Citation syntax and ODT Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:07:46 +0530 Message-ID: <54EC1C3A.2040706@gmail.com> References: <87zj85s1vf.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54EAC71A.6080502@gmail.com> <87twycsg5a.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54EB6D6F.7060005@gmail.com> <87fv9wrz0s.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54EBFF5B.30009@gmail.com> <54EC0CB1.2020408@gmail.com> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ96D-0004Jx-7m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:36:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ96B-0002hN-Is for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:36:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]:45045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ96B-0002hI-BD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:36:03 -0500 Received: by padet14 with SMTP id et14so33636652pad.11 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:36:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Richard Lawrence , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tuesday 24 February 2015 11:37 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Aloha Vaidheeswaran C, > > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:31 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >>> Vaidheeswaran C writes: >>> >>>> Often times there is a difference between what is possible and what is >>>> the common practice. So, >>>> >>>> 1. How often do you intermix in-text and parenthetical styles. >>> >>> Every day? >> >> Ok. >> >>>> 2. Can the document author re-word his work in such a way that an >>>> in-text or parenthetical citation could be replaced by the other >>>> without compromising on the overall style of the produced document. >>> >>> Yes, but the author will certainly choose to use a tool that doesn't >>> require this. >> >> (Let me remind you, when it comes to LaTeX, I have zero knowledge.) >> >> 1. When you say 'tool' what exactly do you mean? >> 2. Give us some concrete examples of what 'this tool' does. >> a) Can an elisp module aspire to replicate what 'this tool' does? >> b) 'The task' that 'this tool' accomplishes, is it 'common' across >> all the citation engines that the participants (in this >> discussion) have in mind. If someone could respond to above questions with concrete examples I will give it due attention. > In my field of archaeology it is not unusual to find a journal that does > not accept LaTeX. When the journal requires Word, which is very common, > I've been converting from LaTeX with tex4ht, but it would be neat to > export directly to ODT. I will be happy to excuse myself from this discussion if ODT/JabRef integration is of no interest to the community.