From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer Stengele Subject: Re: html export does seem to no more recognise EXPORT_ .. PROPERTIES Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:15:05 +0100 Message-ID: <5486F5D9.3020005@online.de> References: <87iohznf27.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <547C77E5.9020408@online.de> <5485B34F.2070007@online.de> <87sigpci8f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyKdH-00082o-TP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:15:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyKdB-0004lv-KQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:15:15 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:52570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyKdB-0004kx-BM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:15:09 -0500 Received: from [10.7.6.33] ([212.34.176.74]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LymEJ-1XsINJ3VAd-01661T for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:15:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87sigpci8f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 09.12.2014 um 09:58 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > Rainer Stengele writes: > >> The only thing that is different from the past is that any "comment" in the PROPERTIES section does seem to confuse the exporter. >> I removed >> >> :PROPERTIES: >> :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: x:/0PROJEKT/Kunden/customer/customer-Dokumentation-yyyymmdd.html >> EXPORT_FILE_NAME: x:/0PROJEKT/Kunden/customer/customer-Dokumentation-another-title.html >> :EXPORT_TITLE: Stoll - IT (HW/SW) - Zugänge - Konfigurationen [Stand: yyyymmdd] >> :END: >> >> As an example I removed the second line in the :PROPERTIES: block and >> the standard html export does respect the file name again. > > Org syntax is much less tolerant wrt property drawers now: they can only > contain node properties. > > > Regards, > > Good to know and reasonable. I am glad the simple (non publishing) functionality did not disappear. I found another strange thing: I do start my Org files with a headline. If the :PROPERTIES: block follows after a blank line the settings are not observed for the subtree. If I delete that empty line it works (filename path is observed). I wonder if this is intended? If yes it could confuse users of such a properties block, thinking it works for the related subtree no matter if empty lines are there or not. Thank you. Regards, Rainer