From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Banel Subject: Re: table formula help... Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <5486143F.8020708@free.fr> References: <87ppbxfi5f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <54838805.8090705@free.fr> <8761do6t01.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <54841BDA.1030801@free.fr> <548425B5.20304@free.fr> <54847C99.20707@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy5bf-0001Ya-FV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:12:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy5be-0006DA-8n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:12:35 -0500 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]:18724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy5be-0006Au-0l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:12:34 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:c90f:b89b:d367:7611] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:c90f:b89b:d367:7611]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E087DD4809C for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:11:14 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode Le 07/12/2014 17:48, Michael Brand a =C3=A9crit : > Hi Thierry > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Thierry Banel wr= ote: >> The new features (:formula parameter and TBLFM survival) have been >> pushed to https://github.com/tbanel/orgaggregate. The unittests.org >> file has been updated. The http://melpa.org repository will reflect >> the change shortly. > Cool, thank you. As a hint for the user you could add something like > "@<$4 =3D string("header") etc. to the TBLFMs in the unittests.org. > > Michael > Good suggestion. What stops me now is that the @<$4 formula (or @1$4) does not work, probably because of a bug. More investigation is needed...