From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Banel Subject: Re: [patch] extend org-meta-return to keywords Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:08:40 +0100 Message-ID: <5471C038.4080102@free.fr> References: <87egszw8ui.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq6o3u57.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvdb4l6c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sihb4ede.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhn36nq1.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnny4ybq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsV28-0000Iy-Kp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:08:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsV22-00026P-G5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:08:48 -0500 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]:3633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsV22-00025T-9C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:08:42 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:bcba:3abd:c61e:580f] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:bcba:3abd:c61e:580f]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22324B00D1 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:05:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87bnny4ybq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Le 23/11/2014 00:20, Nicolas Goaziou a =E9crit : > M-RET, is, first and foremost, an important keybinding for editing the > /structure/ of the document. The behaviour you want to add has nothing > to do with structure. I guess this is the main decision point about Rasmus's proposal. I'm not sure I understand the /structure/ argument. (Is structure about hiding blocks? Parsing org docs?). Nicolas, you have worked a lot on this topic (org-element, new drawer syntax). May be you could elaborate on this. > As a consequence, I'm not sure it should go with M-RET, and if it does, > I'm pretty sure it should not override the main purpose of the binding. > Inserting headlines, and possibly items, is much more important than > duplicating keywords. > We already have M-RET for splitting a table cell (org-table-wrap-region). Should this feature be remapped to some other key-binding? Regards, Thierry