From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Millar Subject: Re: Extremely slow org-table operations Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:12:01 -0400 Message-ID: <5453DF01.90703@verizon.net> References: <87d29brz2k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54517AE2.8060907@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkHcQ-0000Sr-Bn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:12:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkHcI-0006fz-Lx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:12:18 -0400 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]:65064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkHcI-0006ff-IB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:12:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([70.209.138.107]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0NEB00CTQPC42P50@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:12:06 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: York Zhao , emacs-orgmode Hi York, York Zhao wrote: > @Charlie Millar: > > > IIRC Carsten Dominik made the following observation: org tables are > extremely > > slow if they are used as workbooks/spreadsheets and there are many > entries > > (many is undefined). > > Thanks for the information, could you please clarify what "entry" > means? Does it > mean org headline, or a row in an org-table? > > > I learned that the hard way when I had one table - four columns, > three simple > > addition formulas with about 1,000 entries. It seemed an eternity > before the > > addition was completed. > > I guess the "entries" here mean the table rows right? Please confirm. > You are correct; I should have said rows. In my file there were 1000 (+/-) rows and each row had up to three "entries", not including the description in the first row. For instance (without any formulas) in the following row I entered each amount in columns 2,3 & 4. | this was a transaction | 100.00 | 200.00 | 300.00| So I considered this three entries. So actually there were 3,000 (+/-) entries. Charlie