From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: re-exporting a web site Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:04:37 -0400 Message-ID: <5446.1242752677@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87eiuljpdg.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <874ovhchtq.fsf@fastmail.fm> <4130.1242744399@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <18962.51359.186411.657399@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Skg-0000X9-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Skf-0000We-CO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39210 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Skf-0000WP-3t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:17 -0400 Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.227]:41268) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6Skd-0004of-Vp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Eric S Fraga , Eric S Fraga of "Tue, 19 May 2009 15:56:31 BST." <18962.51359.186411.657399@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > As a workaround for the skipping of unmodified files: does setting > > > > org-publish-use-timestamps-flag > > > > to nil temporarily do the deed? I'm not sure what that will do to > > the timestamps: they will probably be completely out of sync afterwards; > > but that's exactly what Matt's method does (for the current project > > only), so it could not be *too* bad !-) > > I guess that would work. In the end, I used Matt's method (having > re-ordered my project list first so that org-mode would choose the > right project by default with the P option...). > I did not try the experiment, but as I indicated in my "D'oh" response to me :-), I think you would run into the same bug that you ran into originally: org-publish with a prefix arg sets org-publish-use-time-stamps-flag to nil around the subordinate org-publish-projects call, so these methods are (probably) equivalent. Can you get a stack trace? Thanks, Nick