From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Grothe Subject: Re: Columns with marking characters are exported to latex (Org 8) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:38:26 +0200 Message-ID: <53F4CF02.40307@th-grothe.de> References: <53F25B21.5060308@th-grothe.de> <8761hppj69.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <871tsdpimx.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <53F27AD2.7020103@th-grothe.de> <87ppfxyue4.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <8738crzt4c.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK8uD-0005NR-65 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:38:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK8u7-0008CJ-20 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:38:37 -0400 Received: from mx02.posteo.de ([89.146.194.165]:57818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK8u6-0008C1-SB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:38:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62513258D265 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from posteo.de ([10.125.125.178]) (using TLS) by localhost (amavis1.posteo.de [10.125.125.165]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTPS id MeJ80RtjL_xG for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 790592C0100 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:38:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8738crzt4c.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Nick Dokos, 20.08.2014 18:34:15: > That leaves the somewhat counterintuitive case of a completely empty > first column which is therefore deemed special and gets stripped. This > could be "fixed" as a special case but instead I propose to document that > behaviour in the above section, with a suggested workaround: if you > really, really want an empty first column, then add a second one. this is a programming problem, which exceeds by far my horizons, so I can not say much about this, it was just important for me to point out the problem, sorry, I think here I can not help ..... but of course I can live with your solution no matter what it looks like... Regards Thorsten * Deutsch - erkannt * Englisch * Englisch