From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Klein Subject: Re: Org 8 Bug in interactive formula editing mode? Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: <53CEBBAC.9000402@roklein.de> References: <20140721090925.73e90201@rudi> <20140721155003.52846bb4@rudi> <87k3763jcc.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140721181458.7e8004db@rudi> <87ppgy1vfx.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140721203626.2a5294c7@rudi> <20140721211725.2a7cd8c3@rudi> <20140721213627.180c865f@rudi> <53CE0434.4040805@roklein.de> <20140722101445.34ada66d@rudi> <87egxd6a7u.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140722190935.03dfdf68@rudi> <871ttd5m4c.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87egxdb4kg.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9fl9-0005w0-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:30:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9fl0-00027L-5g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:29:59 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:61801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9fkz-00027D-RS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:29:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87egxdb4kg.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I made some quick tests with different org versions; the first one I see this issue is git commit 30220ffcdcef45c0237f80a2347d4da19877f64a (release_8.2.6-77-g30220f). I don't see the patch causing this, yet; have to look further. Best regards Robert On 07/22/2014 09:01 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Thorsten Grothe writes: >> >>>> If the frame is bigger than about 50 lines (so that after C-c ', it's >>>> big enough to show the whole table, including the formula and the empty >>>> line underneath it) then I don't see the problem. >>> >>> Thank you very much for your instructions! >>> >>> yes you are right for the org file. I tested Roberts example with your >>> instructions and after resizing the formula frame a bit it works but >>> unfortunately this does not work with my attached tex file. For the >>> first table it works but for the two other tables it does not work >>> even not if I try to resize the formula window, so that I can see the >>> whole table and the formula line, sorry about that :-) I throws me to >>> the end of the buffer again, funny thing :-) >>> > > BTW, I played with your file[fn:1] a bit and I can get around the > problem by resizing the windows so that the file window is more than 100 > lines and the formula editing window is about a dozen lines (I can get > about 132 lines on a monitor rotated into portrait mode - even more by > reducing the font size, but my eyes start complaining at around that > point). > > So I'm pretty sure that the characerization stands: if the frame > (and the file window) is big enough then the problem is not visible. > > Nick > > >