From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Millar Subject: Re: Possible bug - shifting headline - hashmark and what follows is considered part of headline that is shifted Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:19:35 -0400 Message-ID: <53809C67.2010904@verizon.net> References: <537F692D.5010003@verizon.net> <87ppj4wlvj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <537F7614.3090209@verizon.net> <87lhtsv21c.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <537F8A86.6060206@verizon.net> <87vbswti6p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86wqdbbp3e.fsf@somewhere.org> <87d2f3fvzg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoBrV-0000Bh-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 09:19:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoBrP-00035z-2q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 09:19:45 -0400 Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]:55244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoBrO-00035n-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 09:19:39 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([unknown] [70.209.134.101]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N6200CVTYCNYH20@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 08:19:38 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: <87d2f3fvzg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sebastien, Bastien and all, Bastien wrote: > > > Sebastien Vauban > writes: > >> The syntax is "LocalWords:" prefixed by the current "comment prefix". >> Hence, I don't really understand why we would want to transform it in >> "#+ LocalWords:". Yes. Last evening I realized that changing "# LocalWords:" to "#+ LocalWords:" was a terrible idea since it would be of no use for ispell. > > [snip] Putting this in a separate configuration section at the end of > the file is probably the way to go. > However, I thought I would try to place # LocalWords: at the top of a file between any #+ KEYWORDS: and the first * headline. That way it does not become part of a tree/subtree. Is this OK? Charlie --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com