From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: Let's stick to one list for now Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:53:35 -0500 Message-ID: <5331.1299174815@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <4D6B6FFA.50706@gmail.com> <877hcks9qt.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87zkpg8k9r.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87aahgf5rh.fsf@gmail.com> <8762s4f5lx.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87mxld4e9g.fsf@gnu.org> <8762s1bcvy.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipw0wqy5.fsf@altern.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39143 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvCiu-0005os-UM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCin-00087j-RE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:00 -0500 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]:40792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCin-00087P-LD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:53:53 -0500 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LHH00BAUTPB0OL0@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:53:41 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Message from Bastien of "Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:25:54 +0100." <87ipw0wqy5.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > Hello, > > I'm thinking of removing the banner completely. I don't think it is > really useful, and having it as a signature is indeed confusing. > > Would people object? > There are a few times when I've needed to go to the listinfo page and I've followed the link from the banner. I'm sure there are other ways of doing that though, so it's a /small/ objection :-) Nick