From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Randby Subject: Re: publishuing in html5 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <52A882B6.6010904@gmail.com> References: <87vbyxls1c.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <52A7B4AF.9050809@gmail.com> <87haafwnl8.fsf@gmail.com> <52A8730F.2080301@gmail.com> <87ppp3juoi.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlaU-000275-VX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:20:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlaM-00077M-G3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:20:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]:52349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlaM-00076S-B0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:20:26 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id as1so11150382iec.41 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (cpe-24-165-203-246.neo.res.rr.com. [24.165.203.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm9474030igr.7.2013.12.11.07.20.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:20:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ppp3juoi.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 12/11/2013 10:04 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Scott Randby writes: > > >> I tried C-c C-c on the #+OPTIONS line and I tried killing the file and >> opening it up again---neither works. I looked in the manual (section >> 12.3) and noticed that html5-fancy: is not on the list of arguments >> recognized by the #+OPTIONS keyword. > > It's documented in section 12.6.2, "HTML doctypes". Yes, I had seen that documentation earlier, but I can't get it to work. I have no idea what the trouble could be. Any suggestions? > > Nick > > >