From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Markup problems when using references in source fragments Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 02:59:44 -0400 Message-ID: <5257.1305183584@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4DCAE660.2020008@gmail.com> <87boz9nhhr.fsf@norang.ca> <4DCAEC36.1080909@gmail.com> <877h9xng2k.fsf@norang.ca> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKPsE-0004aD-RV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:59:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKPsC-00005o-Vb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:59:50 -0400 Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17]:52037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKPsC-00005c-Rm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:59:48 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LL2001P7M3LUJ10@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:59:45 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Bernt Hansen of "Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:55 EDT." <877h9xng2k.fsf@norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: Roland Kaufmann , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bernt Hansen wrote: > Roland Kaufmann writes: > > > On 2011-05-11 21:51, Bernt Hansen wrote: > >> Both the new and old patch are on the patchwork server waiting to be > >> addressed. > > > > Oops, sorry my bad. I didn't realize that! > > > > However, only the discussion from the first thread: > > > > > > > > is revelant. The patch which is listed there should *not* be > > applied. A second and corrected patch was attached in the last > > message, but it seems to not have been picked up by the framework. > > > > How do I replace the patch above with the code from: > > > > > > > > -- > > Roland. > > I think you can create an account on the patchwork server and then > invalidate your own patches. > If this is possible, can somebody please give details? There is at least one post of mine that ended up as /patch/797/ that should certainly be invalidated, since it quotes the patch from an older commit. And while we are at it: is there any way to mark a post that contains a patch as "not intended for the patchwork server"? One would have to remember to do that, so it's not foolproof, but it might help avoid piling irrelevant stuff on patchwork. Thanks, Nick