emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: Roland Kaufmann <rlndkfmn+orgmode@gmail.com>,
	nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Markup problems when using references in source fragments
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 02:59:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5257.1305183584@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> of "Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:55 EDT." <877h9xng2k.fsf@norang.ca>

Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:

> Roland Kaufmann <rlndkfmn+orgmode@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On 2011-05-11 21:51, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> >> Both the new and old patch are on the patchwork server waiting to be
> >> addressed.
> >
> > Oops, sorry my bad. I didn't realize that!
> >
> > However, only the discussion from the first thread:
> >
> >    <http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/525/>
> >
> > is revelant. The patch which is listed there should *not* be
> > applied. A second and corrected patch was attached in the last
> > message, but it seems to not have been picked up by the framework.
> >
> > How do I replace the patch above with the code from:
> >
> >    <http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/802/>
> >
> > --
> >    Roland.
> 
> I think you can create an account on the patchwork server and then
> invalidate your own patches.
> 

If this is possible, can somebody please give details? There is at least
one post of mine that ended up as /patch/797/ that should certainly be
invalidated, since it quotes the patch from an older commit.

And while we are at it: is there any way to mark a post that contains a
patch as "not intended for the patchwork server"? One would have to
remember to do that, so it's not foolproof, but it might help avoid
piling irrelevant stuff on patchwork.

Thanks,
Nick

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-12  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-11 19:41 Markup problems when using references in source fragments (was: Markup on same line as text) Roland Kaufmann
2011-05-11 19:51 ` Markup problems when using references in source fragments Bernt Hansen
2011-05-11 20:06   ` Roland Kaufmann
2011-05-11 20:21     ` Bernt Hansen
2011-05-12  6:59       ` Nick Dokos [this message]
2011-05-12 10:56         ` Giovanni Ridolfi
2011-05-12 12:43         ` Bernt Hansen
2011-05-12 13:48           ` Nick Dokos
2011-05-25  7:41 ` Markup problems when using references in source fragments (was: Markup on same line as text) Carsten Dominik
2011-05-25 10:31   ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5257.1305183584@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org \
    --to=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
    --cc=bernt@norang.ca \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=rlndkfmn+orgmode@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).