From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniele Pizzolli Subject: Re: list items not treated as such. Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: <524877EE.3030002@toel.it> References: <87txh3v5d6.fsf@rudin.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQMB3-0007iE-Dl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:57:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQMAv-0006fq-B5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:57:09 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:35376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQMAv-0006fi-4j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:57:01 -0400 Received: from mfilter8-d.gandi.net (mfilter8-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.137]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3921F17209A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:56:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter8-d.gandi.net (mfilter8-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eduUHAuGFlTF for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:56:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.235] (host159-38-static.38-79-b.business.telecomitalia.it [79.38.38.159]) (Authenticated sender: me@toel.it) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59EA2172085 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:56:48 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87txh3v5d6.fsf@rudin.co.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 09/29/2013 08:40 PM, Paul Rudin wrote: > > Example: > > 1. Some text that extends over more than one line, I'm not sure if the exact > length is relevant. > a) stuff; and then > b) this item will not be recognised as a list item, which can be a bit of a > pain, so if you're typing with auto-fill on it will be formatted like this, > but really the second line should align underneath the text of the start of > the item. > > > Is this working as intended? It seems wrong to me - if I type item b) > above it surely should fill properly? Hello Paul, Be sure to have this setting: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results none (setq org-list-allow-alphabetical t) #+END_SRC Regards, Daniele