From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Thum Subject: Re: Handling Repeating events from google calendar / repeater interval Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <520551C7.8040006@gmx.de> References: <85k3l1nljo.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51DBAFD6.1030608@gmx.de> <85ppuisdax.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51EBBB7F.4090609@gmx.de> <85ehapqqw2.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51F4DD96.5050807@gmx.de> <85bo5kp57v.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51F907AD.3030600@gmx.de> <51F97F36.8090904@gmx.de> <520405E8.4050309@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7tMD-0005b2-Lg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:32:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7tM2-0003gz-S5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:32:21 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7tM2-0003gV-Jv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:32:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([178.4.216.180]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxxKu-1WAsSC1cI8-015FSR for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:32:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <520405E8.4050309@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stephen Eglen Cc: emacs-orgmode I pushed some conversion code which I am more confident about to the tz-test branch. If you want to re-test, please do so. Cheers, Simon On 08/08/2013 10:56 PM, Simon Thum wrote: > Stephen, > > I now have time to take a look if you send me an example ical. > > Cheers, > > Simon > > > On 07/31/2013 11:18 PM, Simon Thum wrote: >> Yes, probably, but don't count on me in the next 4 days (vacation). >> >> >> On 07/31/2013 11:08 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 31 2013, Simon Thum wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Stephen, >>>> >>>> I probably did not express myself well: The [UTC] means the timestamp >>>> was converted from UTC, which is the case. It is probably quite >>>> confusing to attach a TZ which is no longer supposed to be the case. I >>>> will probably change that. >>>> >>>> Is the org-mode time a correct local time now? I understand from ri_cal >>>> docs that ri_cal should do conversion as expected, but if not I can >>>> probably fix it easily. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Simon >>> >>> hi Simon, (dropping orgmode for now until we find a solution!) >>> >>> no, the org mode times are still GMT rather than with summer time added. >>> >>> Would it help if I made a test calendar to share with you? >>> >>> Stephen >>> >> >> >> > > >