From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Thum Subject: Re: Handling Repeating events from google calendar / repeater interval Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <520405E8.4050309@gmx.de> References: <85k3l1nljo.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51DBAFD6.1030608@gmx.de> <85ppuisdax.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51EBBB7F.4090609@gmx.de> <85ehapqqw2.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51F4DD96.5050807@gmx.de> <85bo5kp57v.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> <51F907AD.3030600@gmx.de> <51F97F36.8090904@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7XFq-00046L-A5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:56:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7XFi-0004kY-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:56:18 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:54030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7XFi-0004jj-MA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:56:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([178.4.16.224]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGB7j-1VKVXq2NKJ-00FFfw for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:56:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <51F97F36.8090904@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stephen Eglen Cc: emacs-orgmode Stephen, I now have time to take a look if you send me an example ical. Cheers, Simon On 07/31/2013 11:18 PM, Simon Thum wrote: > Yes, probably, but don't count on me in the next 4 days (vacation). > > > On 07/31/2013 11:08 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 31 2013, Simon Thum wrote: >> >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> I probably did not express myself well: The [UTC] means the timestamp >>> was converted from UTC, which is the case. It is probably quite >>> confusing to attach a TZ which is no longer supposed to be the case. I >>> will probably change that. >>> >>> Is the org-mode time a correct local time now? I understand from ri_cal >>> docs that ri_cal should do conversion as expected, but if not I can >>> probably fix it easily. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Simon >> >> hi Simon, (dropping orgmode for now until we find a solution!) >> >> no, the org mode times are still GMT rather than with summer time added. >> >> Would it help if I made a test calendar to share with you? >> >> Stephen >> > > >