From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Girard <nicolas.girard@nerim.net>
Subject: Customizing how inactive timestamps are displayed
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:34:01 +0100
Message-ID: <51b0095d0912101434w1e71d321je743002199885752@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NIraG-0001vR-Mj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:34:04 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NIraF-0001tP-Qt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:34:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47720 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIraF-0001sy-Eu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:34:03 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:24044)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>) id 1NIraF-0004RI-3B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:34:03 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so671375fgg.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:34:02 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi again,
in the agenda view, inactive timestamps are displayed like:

  category: 12:50...... [ Some stuff

Is the '[ ' intentional, or is caused by a bug in my configuration ?
I find it a little bit disturbing, as my eyes keep looking for an
hypothetic closing ']'...
If need be, could it be possible to customize this appearance ?