From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Thum Subject: Re: Handling Repeating events from google calendar / repeater interval Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:38:14 +0200 Message-ID: <51DBAFD6.1030608@gmx.de> References: <85k3l1nljo.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwRZ5-0007n2-SB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:38:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwRZ4-0006fu-KO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:38:19 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwRZ4-0006fU-B6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:38:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <85k3l1nljo.fsf@damtp.cam.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stephen Eglen Cc: guivho@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org It's not exactly answering your question but my little tool https://github.com/simonthum/ical2org handles these. HTH, Simon On 07/08/2013 05:00 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: > I'm experimenting using ical2org.sh to import google calendars. One > limitation, as noted in the header is: > > # - does process RRULE recurring events, but ignores COUNT specifiers > > so if you have a repeating event in google (e.g. every day for four > week), the ics file has: > > RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=4 > > The script will take the first day of the event, but not the remaining > three days. I think this could be solved in a couple of ways: > > 1. create four events, moving the date by one each time. > > 2. extending the syntax of timestamps so that something like: > > * Pick up Sam at school > <2007-05-16 Wed 12:30 3+1w> > > means repeat this event 3 times (rather than indefinitely). Or "+1w:3" > or something similar, I don't mind the syntax as long as it doesn't > break other parts of timestamps. > > Has extending the syntax of the repeater interval been considered to > allow finite number of repeats? I can offer to code something up for > consideration if this sounds sensible. > > Thanks, Stephen > >