From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: ical2org.py
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 21:41:40 +0200
Message-ID: <51953674.5030402@gmx.de>
References: <20130512100413.GA26896@sipc87.si.ehu.es>
	<87obcelyp0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <5192A12E.1020001@gmx.de>
	<87txm5npbx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130515080151.GA567@sipc87.si.ehu.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38492)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1Ud43e-0004Ki-3v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 15:41:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1Ud43c-0005Eu-Et
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 15:41:46 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:59590)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1Ud43c-0005EY-6d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 15:41:44 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan
	(mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mfl1O-1UpD7K0txk-00NAUn for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 21:41:42 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20130515080151.GA567@sipc87.si.ehu.es>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: aitor <aitors2005@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 05/15/2013 10:01 AM, aitor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:56:02AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> It's going to be confusing if we add them all.
>>
>> On the contrary -- I think collecting all the information about
>> various solutions in the same place is the only way to encourage
>> comparisons, which is the best way to let one solution emerge,
>> if needed.
>
> indeed. Should I've known there were already so many implementations of
> ical2org I wouldn't have created mine! Silly thing is, it never ocurred
> to me to just search "ical2org" on google.
Similar here, I just checked Worg. However I had some special wishes 
unlikely to be covered, so I was prepared to hack anyway.

I recall to have lost my worg pushability, Bastien can you check? I 
would reorganize this a bit to make it clearer, and do not want to push 
something just to know.

@aitor if you have some info how your impl compares let the list know.

Cheers,

Simon