emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug: Python SRC exec tuple fails [7.9.3f (release_7.9.3f-17-g7524ef <at> MY-PATH/)]
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 16:45:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <518BB66C.1080508@easy-emacs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130509T155325-442@post.gmane.org>

Am 09.05.2013 16:33, schrieb Roland Donat:
> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de> writes:
>
>>
>> Am 08.05.2013 22:50, schrieb Roland Donat:
>>>>> Yes, you're right Andreas. It "fails" to show the accented characters
> if
>>> you
>>>>> try to print the entire tuple.
>>>>> It fails too if you evaluate a[0][0] in your interpreter. You should
> see
>>> :
>>>>>>>> a[0][0]
>>>>> '\xc3\xa9'
>>>>> But print a[0][0] gives the expected answer 'é'
>>>>>
>>>>> So, based on your successful experience consisting in returning a[0]
> [0]
>>> in
>>>>> the orgmode source block, we can assume that org-babel use the python
>>> print
>>>>> function to display results in org buffer, aren't we?
>>>>>
>>>>> Another strange behaviour, when you evaluate the src_block test given
> in
>>>>> example, you get :
>>>>> | \303\251 | a        |
>>>>> | a        | \303\240 |
>>>>>
>>>>> Whereas I was expecting to get the same code than in the python
>>> interpreter,
>>>>> that is :
>>>>> | \xc3\xa9 | a          |
>>>>> | a        | '\xc3\xa0' |
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition, when I try to save my buffer, Emacs doesn't recognize the
>>>>> encoding of characters \303\251 and \303\240 and asks me to choose an
>>>>> encoding. Then, I enter utf-8 and nothing happens BUT when I quit and
>>> reopen
>>>>> my file : the characters are printed correctly.... Too strange for
>>> me....
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Roland.
>>>>
>>>> so what about that:
>>>>
>>>> a = ( ( "é", "a" ), ( "a", "à" ) )
>>>> for i, j in a:
>>>>        print i, j
>>>>
>>>> BTW previous post was sent prematurely..
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, using a couple of for loops will work but the result won't return
> as a
>>> table which is a requirement for me.
>>>
>>> To precise the context a littre more, I have basically 2 source blocks :
>>> 1) the famous python block which must return a table
>>> 2) a R block used to post-process the previous table
>>>
>>> Well, thanks for your help.
>>> I think I spent too much time on this so I'm thinking about changing my
>>> approach. For example, put the result of the first step into a file and
> then
>>> process the file in step 2.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Roland.
>>
>> Just playing a little bit with your example, what about this:
>>
>> #+begin_src python :results output :preamble # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
>> a = ( ( "é", "a" ), ( "a", "à" ) )
>> for i, j in a:
>>       print("|%s | %s|" % (i, j))
>> #+end_src
>>
>>
> Yes Andreas! It works just fine for the python block. But when the python
> result arrives as input of my R post
> processing code,

[ ... ]

The bug so far affected the display only, not the data.
Feeding R with the result returned from your original form should work.

Best,

Andreas

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-09 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-08  6:47 Bug: Python SRC exec tuple fails [7.9.3f (release_7.9.3f-17-g7524ef @ MY-PATH/)] Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08  7:12 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08  7:58   ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08 12:40     ` Eric Schulte
2013-05-08 13:04       ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08 13:20         ` Bug: Python SRC exec tuple fails [7.9.3f (release_7.9.3f-17-g7524ef <at> MY-PATH/)] Roland Donat
2013-05-08 13:37           ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08 14:02             ` Roland Donat
2013-05-08 14:28               ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08 16:11               ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-08 20:50                 ` Roland Donat
2013-05-09  9:01                   ` Andreas Röhler
2013-05-09 14:33                     ` Roland Donat
2013-05-09 14:45                       ` Andreas Röhler [this message]
2013-05-09 19:20                         ` Roland Donat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=518BB66C.1080508@easy-emacs.de \
    --to=andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).