From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert P. Goldman" Subject: Re: phone links... Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <515E3F29.3050201@sift.info> References: <5156228C.4010400@sift.info> <871uaq7aqy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <515DE4E2.2010704@gmx.de> Reply-To: rpgoldman@sift.info Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNwwn-0002Br-2l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:04:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNwwm-0004mW-4o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:04:13 -0400 Received: from 23-25-144-217-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([23.25.144.217]:55195 helo=mpls.sift.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNwwl-0004mL-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:04:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <515DE4E2.2010704@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Thum Cc: Bastien , Org Mode On 4/4/13 Apr 4 -3:38 PM, Simon Thum wrote: > Since you're at it: I keep the attached patch personally. I use it to > sync org-contacts entries to my phone. > > I didn't sign up to the FSF so far, and suck at maintaining emacs commit > msg conventions. If the patch is interesting I'll do what is required. I'm afraid I don't use org-contacts, so I don't exactly understand how this relates. Are "phone:" links desired? I.e., would you make the values of the phone fields be phone-type org hyperlinks? Or would you just expect to be able to push phone numbers directly into the org-phone-call function, without having to make the contact entries explicitly be hyperlinks? I suppose one should also attempt to make this compatible with the org/BBDB integration, another thing about which I'm quite ignorant.... Best, r P.S. I note that the contacts databases I have access typically have FAX and mobile entries as well as home and work. Many also allow "custom" phone number types.