From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de>
Subject: Re: :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:21:46 +0100
Message-ID: <514C770A.7030903@online.de>
References: <kif0ka$8ms$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CA+M2ft-tjnTLN_wkeR0ryBxeJOnRwxZLQOJtSo08E611vHCqag@mail.gmail.com>
	<514C0B38.4080404@online.de> <87ehf75vmh.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54466)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1UJ3mz-0004UP-Ih
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:21:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1UJ3mw-0004Cy-AR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:21:53 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59111)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1UJ3mv-0004Cf-Ix
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:21:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ehf75vmh.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Am 22.03.2013 15:58, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Hello,
>
> Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de> writes:
>
>> Another funny issue here is that for the test my exported subtree has
>> the tag :noexport:
>>
>> My setting is:
>>
>> org-export-exclude-tags is a variable defined in `ox.el'.
>> Its value is ("noexport")
>>
>> So the export shouldn't export that subtree shouldn't it?
> You're explicitly asking for a subtree export. There's no reason for the
> export framework to think it is smarter than you and prevent you from
> doing so.
>
> When exporting a subtree, the parser only looks at the contents of the
> top level headline, not at its tags.
>
>
> Regards,
>
Makes sense, thanks.

Rainer