From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer M Krug Subject: Re: [babel] Commenting out src blocks for tangling Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:42:57 +0100 Message-ID: <512F26A1.7020807@gmail.com> References: <87r4k18wy2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mwup8t0q.fsf@breezy.my.home> <87bob58sdi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <512e97cf.82c1ec0a.76d4.ffffc5f1@mx.google.com> <512F1CDF.80906@gmail.com> <877glsg57i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <867gls9451.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48237) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB017-0004L6-2k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:43:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB011-00076V-OQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:43:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <867gls9451.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban , Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28/02/13 10:30, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Bastien, > > Bastien wrote: >> Rainer M Krug writes: >> >>> I agree - COMMENTing a subtree should automatically disable tangling of code blocks in the >>> subtree. Would this something which could be introduced easily, as it seems there are >>> quite a few who assumed that it would be doing it? >> >> This is now the case in master: http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=8e0b45 > > Does it work as well for the `:noexport:' tag? I don't think it should. Tangling is something different to export, so there should not be ay interactions between the two in this respect. On the other hand, COMMENT is generic - it is a COMMENT and does not concern anything. So it is applicable for tangling as well. I would actually say it would be counterintuitive if :noexport: would influence tangling as it is governed by a completely different approach in org as well as in what I am doing with the org file. Cheers, Rainer > > Best regards, Seb > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRLyahAAoJENvXNx4PUvmCy7UIAMEFBm2FV3MaCaJuurMdh9g4 3JyoLMmgvAEhDHjIfyLHviN+RC7jr/77Xcc+2WwSlMY2RAPE6isRVIFkFR+roSHy TTyYzQu8DOCsZjWHqQM+FLl5sxPvqU0KvUlXXVzND1m48uehJkU07E77eH43AM/Q ThSanN0cIwC25u5PyPe7xi9SRoWXUYGTmsu9Ymg3J2zzmYOn8l9rSb7l68Y3fQTA 9i3SFzgyyXAJy453zNkZsoyOhCgP4kNtwZ9iLVW934sNJE1pVhMsr8wNfYfY+S+s FjNqePE+izC4uHIrSaGaw3COlar6qgPSTKQmF+ueNw/FjPL+TJsPVgSH2pig3+k= =b7/g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----