From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Randby Subject: Re: Moving from Jekyll to Orgmode Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <50f36953-4528-91f1-d4c9-05228a967f11@gmail.com> References: <1524949519.21032.171.camel@gmail.com> <9B08D8CE-B75D-4415-8D9F-2CA9ED27C772@zzamboni.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCY5m-00041F-9k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:13:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCY5l-0000gJ-Gv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:13:18 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]:44405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCY5l-0000g8-C0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:13:17 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id d11-v6so6378471iof.11 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:a000:121e:108:e673:5f28:df8f:f285? ([2605:a000:121e:108:e673:5f28:df8f:f285]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f63-v6sm1985598itb.2.2018.04.28.15.13.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:13:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B08D8CE-B75D-4415-8D9F-2CA9ED27C772@zzamboni.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 04/28/2018 05:40 PM, Diego Zamboni wrote: > > Org-mode is not really a website-publishing tool like Jekyll, although it can be part of the chain. Org-mode at its core is a markup language, although with considerable tooling support from org-mode and related tools in Emacs. > I think Org is a good website publishing tool in many ways. I've been using it for making and publishing my website since 2010. Sure, it has some limitations, but I think it can be made to work nicely for a lot of types of sites. But I do agree that the Org/Hugo combination is really good. Scott Randby