From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Hofert <marius.hofert@math.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: org-capture-template: "SCHEDULED:" obsolete?
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 11:35:54 +0100
Message-ID: <50FAEEF1-ECE1-4EAC-8C66-4092E3403C51@math.ethz.ch>
References: <7B1F3AAB-848A-4767-9E37-01137574AEC8@math.ethz.ch>
	<4EB661BB.8020000@jboecker.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46148)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marius.hofert@math.ethz.ch>) id 1RN050-0006q4-7s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:35:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marius.hofert@math.ethz.ch>) id 1RN04z-0006qE-BS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:35:58 -0500
Received: from edge20.ethz.ch ([82.130.99.26]:22365)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marius.hofert@math.ethz.ch>) id 1RN04z-0006ps-6b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:35:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4EB661BB.8020000@jboecker.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6cker?= <jan.boecker@jboecker.de>
Cc: Emacs help <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Thanks a lot, Jan, that explained it very well.

Cheers,

Marius

On 2011-11-06, at 11:30 , Jan B=F6cker wrote:

> On 11/05/2011 11:35 PM, Marius Hofert wrote:
>=20
>> Apparently, the string "SCHEDULED:" is not required for an entry to =
appear in agenda view.=20
>=20
> Hi Marius,
>=20
> the difference between <date> and SCHEDULED: <date> is that <date> =
will
> cause the entry to appear in the agenda only on the given day, whereas
> SCHEDULED: <date> will also cause the entry to be displayed on the
> current day if it is scheduled in the past and has not been marked =
DONE yet.
>=20
> To see what I mean, put the following entries into an agenda file:
>=20
> * Test 1
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-11-05 Sat>
>=20
> * DONE Test 2
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-11-05 Sat>
>=20
> * Test 3
>  <2011-11-05 Sat>
>=20
> Because Test 1 it is not marked done, if you refresh your agenda view
> today, you will see something like this:
>=20
> Sched. 2x:  Test 1
>=20
> Test 2 does not show up because it is marked DONE and Test 3 does not
> show up because it does not contain the SCHEDULED keyword.
>=20
> (Note that Test 1 will only show up on the agenda view for today and =
the
> day it was scheduled for when you look at the agenda view for a day in
> the past or future, for example by using the weekly or monthly view or
> going forward/backward with the f and b keys.
>=20
> For more information, please refer to Section 8.3, "Deadlines and
> scheduling", in the Org manual.
>=20
> Hope this helps,
>  Jan