From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Butz Subject: Upgrade to org 7.9.3.: clock in/out and org-odt export Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:10:28 +0100 Message-ID: <50EC7D34.8010009@mkblog.org> Reply-To: mb@mkblog.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49511) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsfVI-0003R4-Do for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:10:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsfVH-0000RC-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:10:32 -0500 Received: from [212.227.83.185] (port=59755 helo=mail.sym.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsfVG-0000Qx-TZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:10:31 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, I just upgraded from 7.6 to 7.9.3. I went through the installation process as described in [1]. I dicovered two things, which I do not know how to solve on my own: (1) Clock in/out just by toggeling the task state does not work anymore. For starting and stopping the clock I have the code from Sacha Chua [2] in my dot-emacs. I suppose, that this does not work any more with the new org-code. As I frequently rely on the clock I would be glad to solve the problem. Does someone have a hint for me? (2) I did some tests with the org-odt-exporter, which where successful in case of a small test file but failed with some of my daily used file. In one case the emacs message buffer seemed to contain the whole export output (pasting just a few lines here) -------------------------------8<------------------------------------ #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent)) wrap-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent))) 48810 49241 (fontified nil org-category "hfk-design-durch-aneignung" line-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent)) wrap-prefix #(" " 0 13 (face org-indent))) 49241 49242 (fontified nil org-category "hfk-design-durch-aneignung" line-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent)) wrap-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent))) 49242 49340 (fontified nil org-category "hfk-design-durch-aneignung" line-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent)) wrap-prefix #(" " 0 13 (face org-indent))) 49341 49361 (original-indentation 0) 49361 49362 (fontified nil org-category "hfk-design-durch-aneignung" line-prefix #(" " 0 10 (face org-indent)) wrap-prefix #(" " 0 13 (face org-indent))) 49362 49374 (fontified nil org-category "hfk-design-durch-aneignung" line-prefix #( -------------------------------8<------------------------------------ I did get nothing else and wonder, what's the best way to debug such a case? Greetings Martin [1] [2] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | G. Martin Butz, mb@mkblog.org, 0421 98749324, www.mkblog.org | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~