From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Beck <fb@miszellen.de>
Subject: Re: Ignoring empty subtrees/new exporter
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:46:12 +0100
Message-ID: <50EB2604.1050103@miszellen.de>
References: <50E880A8.4080003@miszellen.de> <877gnq622s.fsf@gmail.com>
	<50E9F288.1050904@miszellen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44819)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fb@miszellen.de>) id 1TsIeO-0006OO-OY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:46:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fb@miszellen.de>) id 1TsIeM-0007tt-6i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:46:24 -0500
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5300::1]:63315)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fb@miszellen.de>) id 1TsIeL-0007tP-Vn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:46:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <50E9F288.1050904@miszellen.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

On 01/06/2013 10:54 PM, Florian Beck wrote:
> On 01/06/2013 11:24 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> The global idea is correct, but I find that the implementation is too
>> low level. It also taints original e-latex back-end.
>>
>> I suggest the following instead:
>
> Thanks a lot!  A derived backend seems like a good idea. Unfortunatly,
> the function org-export-with-backend isn't in the latest
> org-plus-contrib package (20121231). I'll try it then.

Well, I've switched to the git version. The version in 
"org-plus-contrib" is a very one from the maint-branch, which kind of 
defeats the purpose of the package, doesn't it? Anyway, your suggestion 
now works perfectly, thanks again.