From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de>
Subject: Re: Extend (org-shiftcontrolup) and (org-shiftcontroldown) with
 numeric arguments?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:37:56 +0100
Message-ID: <50D233B4.4060606@online.de>
References: <k4jdl5$tvm$1@ger.gmane.org> <87wqz582gw.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87obhrgv8s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54182)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1TlRL6-00085Q-V0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:38:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1TlRL5-00063y-Oq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:38:08 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:58937)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rainer.stengele@online.de>) id 1TlRL5-00063d-FM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:38:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87obhrgv8s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Am 18.12.2012 15:00, schrieb Bastien:
> Hi Rainer and Nicolas,
> 
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I think it would be a welcomed improvement, since there's already
>> support for that in `org-timestamp-up' and `org-timestamp-down'. Do you
>> want to do it?
> 
> I just implemented this.  It's now in master.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
Bastien,

thanks a lot!

Rainer